
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s A Guy To Do???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkflop.com/blog/2010/01/whats-a-guy-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkflop.com/blog/2010/01/whats-a-guy-to-do/</link>
	<description>Probably not what you think...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: business daily</title>
		<link>http://talkflop.com/blog/2010/01/whats-a-guy-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-8329</link>
		<dc:creator>business daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkflop.com/blog/?p=342#comment-8329</guid>
		<description>.Preflop fine...Flop is fine...Turn is a fold...River is an easy fold....--...To call turn you have to ...1 Put him on air...2 Put him on air...3 Put him on air...To call river you have to ...1 Put him on air when its obviuos you have a boat...2 Put him on air when its obvius you have a boat...3 Put him on air when its obvious you have a boat ...Without a read i think youre toast here WAY more than the 2 1 youre getting to call....I know people get out of line - but this would be one of the DUMBEST bluff lines of all time. Your line is completlely consistent with any pair 88 - and the thought of you folding it here is absurd....Call me crazy but his line looks like 6x....14 11 1.8 is really nitty - and id def need a read that hes getting out of line to make a turn call..let alone a river call....Im also not sure why we are even betting the turn - do you really think were getting 3 streets out of 22 33 44? ....... .hmm rethinking this hand a bit...Are you assuming that...1 he never takes this line with a med pair 88-JJ - and pretty much plays bluff-catcher with them?...If so - hes certainly polarized between nuts air here. Id still fold but its probably closer. ....... .Forgot to say Id been taking down a lot of pots without going to showdown within the last few orbits....His flop call was a bit suspicious to me I think I maybe made it a bit too small and he could float with a hand like AJ....either that or a 6. I think hed raise any pocket pair here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.Preflop fine&#8230;Flop is fine&#8230;Turn is a fold&#8230;River is an easy fold&#8230;.&#8211;&#8230;To call turn you have to &#8230;1 Put him on air&#8230;2 Put him on air&#8230;3 Put him on air&#8230;To call river you have to &#8230;1 Put him on air when its obviuos you have a boat&#8230;2 Put him on air when its obvius you have a boat&#8230;3 Put him on air when its obvious you have a boat &#8230;Without a read i think youre toast here WAY more than the 2 1 youre getting to call&#8230;.I know people get out of line &#8211; but this would be one of the DUMBEST bluff lines of all time. Your line is completlely consistent with any pair 88 &#8211; and the thought of you folding it here is absurd&#8230;.Call me crazy but his line looks like 6x&#8230;.14 11 1.8 is really nitty &#8211; and id def need a read that hes getting out of line to make a turn call..let alone a river call&#8230;.Im also not sure why we are even betting the turn &#8211; do you really think were getting 3 streets out of 22 33 44? &#8230;&#8230;. .hmm rethinking this hand a bit&#8230;Are you assuming that&#8230;1 he never takes this line with a med pair 88-JJ &#8211; and pretty much plays bluff-catcher with them?&#8230;If so &#8211; hes certainly polarized between nuts air here. Id still fold but its probably closer. &#8230;&#8230;. .Forgot to say Id been taking down a lot of pots without going to showdown within the last few orbits&#8230;.His flop call was a bit suspicious to me I think I maybe made it a bit too small and he could float with a hand like AJ&#8230;.either that or a 6. I think hed raise any pocket pair here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chewie</title>
		<link>http://talkflop.com/blog/2010/01/whats-a-guy-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-4548</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkflop.com/blog/?p=342#comment-4548</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Steve.  Next time I run across this I&#039;ll try to reconstruct the hand before moving forward!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Steve.  Next time I run across this I&#8217;ll try to reconstruct the hand before moving forward!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://talkflop.com/blog/2010/01/whats-a-guy-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkflop.com/blog/?p=342#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very rare for players to raise a turn bet without a huge hand, unless they are a really good thinking player.  Still really hard to getaway from your hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very rare for players to raise a turn bet without a huge hand, unless they are a really good thinking player.  Still really hard to getaway from your hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

